View Single Post
Old 03-09-2010, 12:45   #7
poparamiro
Super Moderator
 
poparamiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 5,876
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)




Send a message via ICQ to poparamiro Send a message via AIM to poparamiro Send a message via Yahoo to poparamiro Send a message via Skype™ to poparamiro
Default

Radeon 5870 furmark temperature test

1250rpm
23c ambient
1250mv/1000mhz
Spitfire/MX-4

640x480 fullscreen min - 42c
640x480 window min - 42c
640x480 fullscreen ex mode - 44c
1600x1200 window max - 51c
1600x1200 fulscreen ex mode noaa - 51c
1600x1200 fulscreen min - 48c

kombustor_1 - 43c
kombustor_2 - 47c
kombustor_3 - 47c
kombustor_4 - 48c
kombustor_5 - 49c (D3D9/1600x1200/post fx/ex mode/8xQ CSAA)

Se poate observa foarte usor ca stresul termic maxim se atinge la rezolutie maxima si cu setarile maxime posibile, lucru aratat si de puterea afisata de furmark (117 watt/82 watt, acelasi vgpu la ambele teste).

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeDeRa View Post
Ma intreb daca inghesuit intr-o carcasa ar avea super performantele astea sau ar creste temperaturile Dar totusi, sa tii la 800rpm sub 80* un Fermi e genial!
Depinde de ambientul din carcasa si dupa cum se vede, depinde enorm de racirea vrm-ului. La fermi stock nu este prea bine racit vrm-ul chiar daca plate-ul este masiv, el ajunge repede la temperaturi mari.

Acolo este GF100 cu 2200rpm pe gpu si 800rpm pe vrm, pentru ca am studiat influenta racirii vrm-ului asupra temperaturii gpu-ului. In jocuri sau chiar furmark, pe gf 100 voltaj default/spitfire nu se ating 80c la 800rpm (in conditiile mele)

Folosirea unui ventilator de 140mm de turatie mica este recomandat unuia de 120 si turatie mare pentru ca Spitfire nu scaleaza defel bine cu turatia si pe deasupra daca se foloseste ventilator de 120mm doua hp cu doua "blocuri" de racire sunt pasive pentru ca nu ajunge airflow-ul la ele si nu sunt legate intre ele.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	640x480_fullscreen_min.JPG
Views:	1282
Size:	146.5 KB
ID:	10902   Click image for larger version

Name:	640x480_fullscreen_xtreme.png
Views:	1486
Size:	267.6 KB
ID:	10903   Click image for larger version

Name:	640x480_window_min.JPG
Views:	1504
Size:	190.8 KB
ID:	10904   Click image for larger version

Name:	1600_fullscreen_max.JPG
Views:	1520
Size:	183.6 KB
ID:	10905   Click image for larger version

Name:	1600_ex_noaa.png
Views:	1470
Size:	273.7 KB
ID:	10906   Click image for larger version

Name:	1600_full_min.JPG
Views:	1476
Size:	142.0 KB
ID:	10907   Click image for larger version

Name:	k_1.JPG
Views:	1437
Size:	141.0 KB
ID:	10920   Click image for larger version

Name:	k_2.JPG
Views:	1439
Size:	137.0 KB
ID:	10921   Click image for larger version

Name:	k_3.JPG
Views:	1452
Size:	136.9 KB
ID:	10922   Click image for larger version

Name:	k_4.JPG
Views:	1451
Size:	137.3 KB
ID:	10923  

Click image for larger version

Name:	k_5.JPG
Views:	1489
Size:	137.4 KB
ID:	10924  

Last edited by poparamiro; 03-09-2010 at 14:28.
poparamiro is offline   Reply With Quote