lab501 forum  

Go Back   lab501 forum > Hardware > Placi video
Connect with Facebook

Placi video Zise si acceleratoare grafice


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-05-2010, 08:27   #2001
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Prieteni, aia e versiunea OC cu ajustare a voltajului pe rail-uri. O tine, nu zic nu, da aia normala nu tine mai mult de 1250W load.
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 10:15   #2002
dev
Ancient friend
 
dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)




Default

Pai 1700w la priza cu eficienta 80% inseamna in jur de 1350w. Ceea ce pentru o sursa respecatbila de 1200w nu e extraordinar de mult. Se practica destul de des subestimarea unei surse pentru a mentine eficienta mai sus, de pilda asta poate fi o sursa de 1400w si eficienta 80% sau una de 1200w si eficienta 82%. In ziua de azi eficienta a devenit al doilea criteriu de marketing dupa watti.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now View Post
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog.
dev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 10:17   #2003
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Dupa ce a masura nenea jonny guru sursa are o eficienta semnificativ mai mare decat 80%
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 10:41   #2004
dev
Ancient friend
 
dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)




Default

Pai atunci n-ar trebui sa aiba probleme sa scoata peste 1200.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now View Post
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog.
dev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 11:04   #2005
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Cred ca nu intelegi. Cu cat e eficienta mai mare, cu atat procentul din 1700W e mai mare. Chestie care e specifica modelului OC dar nu si celui normal, care la 1250W max se inchide, am testat cu mana mea
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 11:05   #2006
matose
Administrator
 
matose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,803
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Send a message via Yahoo to matose
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dev View Post
Pai 1700w la priza
Ei zic ca e 1700W consumul DC (al sistemului). Comentariul lui hipro referitor la filmuletul asta e flawless
__________________
matose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 11:08   #2007
icsu
Ancient friend
 
icsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,489
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Send a message via Skype™ to icsu
Default

Dap, la o sursa de 1500W care consuma 1500w unde eficienta e de 82% sursa de 1500w consuma 1500w dar ea livreaza 1230w.. daca poate sa livreze mai mult de 82% eficienta scade. Se garanteaza o eficienta minima.
PS: sunt cam adormit
PS2: Monstruuu??? radi...
icsu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 17:11   #2008
Steve-o
Ancient friend
 
Steve-o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: la bloc
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Nvidia GTX460 gets listed.
Steve-o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 22:37   #2009
mascotzel
Ancient friend
 
mascotzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,504
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)




Default

Inno3D GTX480 iChill Black Series W/C (@xtremecomputing)
mascotzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2010, 23:51   #2010
MazuX
Senior Member
 
MazuX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-I5cF...IY&feature=sub
Ce alien si ce temperatura la CPU
__________________
Live your life without regret, don't be someone whom theyll forget

MazuX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2010, 00:51   #2011
495
Senior Member
 
495's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Preston, UK
Posts: 1,907
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

21 de views...

frumos setup, o descriere mai detaliata era buna.
__________________
495 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2010, 12:26   #2012
shogun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)


Default

Se pare ca GTX 460 (bazata pe GF104) o sa apara mai tirziu. Pentru 1 iunie e prevazuta lansarea la GTX 465 bazata tot pe Fermi GF100, dar castrat mai mult decit GTX 470 (352 stream processors, 1GB of RAM, and a 256-bit memory interface). E posibil sa nu ofere o performanta impresionanta pentru 300$, pretul de referinta.

"In eNet's benchmark tests, the GTX 465 was a little quicker than the competing Radeon HD 5870 in Far Cry 2, "significantly slower" than the Radeon HD 5830 in Crysis Warhead, and split the Radeon HD 5850 and 5870 in Unigine's Heaven."
shogun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2010, 12:52   #2013
dev
Ancient friend
 
dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)




Default

Probabil in aplicatiile care nu sunt nvidia friendly va fi la acelasi nivel cu 5830 dar cu 20% mai scumpa. Mda fac si astia flood pe toate segmentele de pret pina apare performance si mainstreamu.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now View Post
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog.
dev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-05-2010, 14:34   #2014
Belferu
Member
 
Belferu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

GTX 465 - http://en.expreview.com/2010/05/14/t...html#more-7119
cam slabuta (sa nu zic varza ). sunt curios la ce pret o sa se vanda.
Belferu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2010, 00:33   #2015
MazuX
Senior Member
 
MazuX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-...f104/9097.html hmm sper sa tina piept la 2 x gtx 480 dar asta ramane de vazut
__________________
Live your life without regret, don't be someone whom theyll forget

MazuX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2010, 02:49   #2016
mascotzel
Ancient friend
 
mascotzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,504
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)




Default

oare e ora tarzie de vina?

GF104 (aka GTX460<GTX465<GTX470<GTX480) e mult mai slab ca GXT480, cum sa tina un dual GF104 piept la dual GTX480?
mascotzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2010, 07:42   #2017
nachtfalke
VIP
 
nachtfalke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Liquid Nitrogen
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)




Default

Din cate stiu eu GF 104 este derivat din chipul GF100

GF 104 se adreseaza clasei mainstream, daca vrem ceva interesant trebuie sa asteptam un dual GPU pe GF 100 , acesta avand dezactivate 32 procesoare stream( 480 din 512 cate are cipul initial)

Dar cu siguranta Nvidia va avea mult de lucru la asa ceva , datorita consumului imens de care dispune un sg gtx 480( de aproape 300w), normele ATX impune bariera maxima de 300W pe o singura placa grafica , deci ..... nvidia si cu dual gpu pe GF 100 nu vom vedea prea curand .......
__________________
@[Wanted] Este foarte clar ca fps-urile tale (1525) nu sunt rezultatul unei frecvente de 1170mhz, ci undeva in jurul a 800 mhz.
nachtfalke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2010, 15:37   #2018
MazuX
Senior Member
 
MazuX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mascotzel View Post
oare e ora tarzie de vina?

GF104 (aka GTX460<GTX465<GTX470<GTX480) e mult mai slab ca GXT480, cum sa tina un dual GF104 piept la dual GTX480?
he he no way nu inteleg o chestie......la specs am gasit p un site gtx 295-pcx 2.0 iar la gtx 480 scrie pcx 2.1 care e diferenta??poate se apropie pcx 3.0
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	gtx400_specs.png
Views:	581
Size:	72.6 KB
ID:	8649  
__________________
Live your life without regret, don't be someone whom theyll forget


Last edited by MazuX; 15-05-2010 at 21:58.
MazuX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2010, 16:17   #2019
mascotzel
Ancient friend
 
mascotzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,504
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)




Default

pai cum?
mascotzel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-05-2010, 22:05   #2020
dev
Ancient friend
 
dev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)




Default

Problema e alta: s-ar parea ca si un eventual chip GF104 dual sare din specificatii la consum. Pur si simplu nu cred ca o sa vedem dual GPU de Fermi pe 40nm.

Nvidia va face ceea ce stie mai bine, adica sa confuzeze lumea cu produse asemanatoare. GTX465 nu reprezinta decit rebuturile care nu trec stacheta impusa de GTX 470 si 480.

GTX 460 bazata pe GF104 va fi un chip nou croit pe Fermi.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now View Post
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog.
dev is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Noutati despre procesoare Intel Monstru Procesoare si chipseturi 6287 18-03-2024 16:04
Noutati despre telefoane mobile Monstru Telefoane mobile si alte gadgeturi 6289 06-03-2024 19:05
Noutati despre placile video ATI/AMD Monstru Placi video 11475 29-02-2024 10:01
Noutati despre procesoare AMD Monstru Procesoare si chipseturi 9098 21-02-2024 13:54
Noutati despre SSD-uri Monstru Memorii & stocare 1541 08-01-2024 18:55

 
Forum Stats
Members: 9,575
Threads: 27,919
Posts: 783,119
Total Online: 4068

Newest Member: Skylinedoom

Latest Threads
- by Kspic
- by suzuki
- by matose

Advertisement

Partner Links



All times are GMT +3. The time now is 20:20.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.