|
 |
|
11-05-2010, 08:27
|
#2001
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,041
Mentioned: 759 Post(s)
|
Prieteni, aia e versiunea OC cu ajustare a voltajului pe rail-uri. O tine, nu zic nu, da aia normala nu tine mai mult de 1250W load.
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 10:15
|
#2002
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Pai 1700w la priza cu eficienta 80% inseamna in jur de 1350w. Ceea ce pentru o sursa respecatbila de 1200w nu e extraordinar de mult. Se practica destul de des subestimarea unei surse pentru a mentine eficienta mai sus, de pilda asta poate fi o sursa de 1400w si eficienta 80% sau una de 1200w si eficienta 82%. In ziua de azi eficienta a devenit al doilea criteriu de marketing dupa watti.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog.  |
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 10:17
|
#2003
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,041
Mentioned: 759 Post(s)
|
Dupa ce a masura nenea jonny guru sursa are o eficienta semnificativ mai mare decat 80%
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 10:41
|
#2004
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Pai atunci n-ar trebui sa aiba probleme sa scoata peste 1200.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog. |
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:04
|
#2005
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,041
Mentioned: 759 Post(s)
|
Cred ca nu intelegi. Cu cat e eficienta mai mare, cu atat procentul din 1700W e mai mare. Chestie care e specifica modelului OC dar nu si celui normal, care la 1250W max se inchide, am testat cu mana mea
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:05
|
#2006
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,584
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dev
Pai 1700w la priza
|
Ei zic ca e 1700W consumul DC (al sistemului). Comentariul lui hipro referitor la filmuletul asta e flawless 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 11:08
|
#2007
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,489
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
|
Dap, la o sursa de 1500W care consuma 1500w unde eficienta e de 82% sursa de 1500w consuma 1500w dar ea livreaza 1230w.. daca poate sa livreze mai mult de 82% eficienta scade. Se garanteaza o eficienta minima.
PS: sunt cam adormit
PS2: Monstruuu??? radi...
|
|
|
|
|
11-05-2010, 17:11
|
#2008
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: la bloc
Posts: 5,763
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2010, 22:37
|
#2009
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,504
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2010, 23:51
|
#2010
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
__________________
Live your life without regret, don't be someone whom theyll forget
|
|
|
|
|
13-05-2010, 00:51
|
#2011
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Preston, UK
Posts: 1,906
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
|
21 de views...
frumos setup, o descriere mai detaliata era buna.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
14-05-2010, 12:26
|
#2012
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 311
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
|
Se pare ca GTX 460 (bazata pe GF104) o sa apara mai tirziu. Pentru 1 iunie e prevazuta lansarea la GTX 465 bazata tot pe Fermi GF100, dar castrat mai mult decit GTX 470 (352 stream processors, 1GB of RAM, and a 256-bit memory interface). E posibil sa nu ofere o performanta impresionanta pentru 300$, pretul de referinta.
"In eNet's benchmark tests, the GTX 465 was a little quicker than the competing Radeon HD 5870 in Far Cry 2, "significantly slower" than the Radeon HD 5830 in Crysis Warhead, and split the Radeon HD 5850 and 5870 in Unigine's Heaven."
|
|
|
|
|
14-05-2010, 12:52
|
#2013
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Probabil in aplicatiile care nu sunt nvidia friendly va fi la acelasi nivel cu 5830 dar cu 20% mai scumpa. Mda fac si astia flood pe toate segmentele de pret pina apare performance si mainstreamu.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog. |
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2010, 00:33
|
#2015
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
http://vr-zone.com/articles/-rumour-...f104/9097.html hmm sper sa tina piept la 2 x gtx 480 dar asta ramane de vazut
__________________
Live your life without regret, don't be someone whom theyll forget
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2010, 02:49
|
#2016
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,504
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
|
oare e ora tarzie de vina?
GF104 (aka GTX460<GTX465<GTX470<GTX480) e mult mai slab ca GXT480, cum sa tina un dual GF104 piept la dual GTX480?
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2010, 07:42
|
#2017
|
|
VIP
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Liquid Nitrogen
Posts: 2,595
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
|
Din cate stiu eu GF 104 este derivat din chipul GF100
GF 104 se adreseaza clasei mainstream, daca vrem ceva interesant trebuie sa asteptam un dual GPU pe GF 100 , acesta avand dezactivate 32 procesoare stream( 480 din 512 cate are cipul initial)
Dar cu siguranta Nvidia va avea mult de lucru la asa ceva , datorita consumului imens de care dispune un sg gtx 480( de aproape 300w), normele ATX impune bariera maxima de 300W pe o singura placa grafica , deci ..... nvidia si cu dual gpu pe GF 100 nu vom vedea prea curand .......
__________________
@[Wanted] Este foarte clar ca fps-urile tale (1525) nu sunt rezultatul unei frecvente de 1170mhz, ci undeva in jurul a 800 mhz.
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2010, 15:37
|
#2018
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,011
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascotzel
oare e ora tarzie de vina?
GF104 (aka GTX460<GTX465<GTX470<GTX480) e mult mai slab ca GXT480, cum sa tina un dual GF104 piept la dual GTX480?
|
he he no way nu inteleg o chestie......la specs am gasit p un site gtx 295-pcx 2.0 iar la gtx 480 scrie pcx 2.1 care e diferenta??poate se apropie pcx 3.0
__________________
Live your life without regret, don't be someone whom theyll forget
Last edited by MazuX; 15-05-2010 at 21:58.
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2010, 16:17
|
#2019
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,504
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
|
pai cum?
|
|
|
|
|
15-05-2010, 22:05
|
#2020
|
|
Ancient friend
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,277
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Problema e alta: s-ar parea ca si un eventual chip GF104 dual sare din specificatii la consum. Pur si simplu nu cred ca o sa vedem dual GPU de Fermi pe 40nm.
Nvidia va face ceea ce stie mai bine, adica sa confuzeze lumea cu produse asemanatoare. GTX465 nu reprezinta decit rebuturile care nu trec stacheta impusa de GTX 470 si 480.
GTX 460 bazata pe GF104 va fi un chip nou croit pe Fermi.
__________________
It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apocalypse Now
Sa nu fim pizde, va rog. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
| Forum Stats |
Members: 9,417
Threads: 26,859
Posts: 769,998
Total Online: 1053
Newest Member: Taangh
|
| Partner Links |
Viziteaza-ne pe Facebook
Urmareste-ne pe Twitter
Vezi ce facem pe YouTube
|
|
|
Viziteaza-ne pe Facebook
Urmareste-ne pe Twitter
Vezi ce facem pe YouTube