lab501 forum  

Go Back   lab501 forum > Extreme 501 > Overclocking & benchmarking
Connect with Facebook

Overclocking & benchmarking Nu te supara, ce inseamna "stock" ?


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 15-12-2016, 00:33   #41
Amok
Ancient friend
 
Amok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Romania, Bucharest
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

3930k la 4.4 Ghz, 6c/12t

34.28s.

As zice clar ca acest bench adora frecventa mare. Dar e un bench prost, la o scena reala, cu render de macar 15-20min, acolo frecventa asta nu ar aduce un asa mare plus si nucleele si-ar spune cuvantul.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Result_3930k_4.4Ghz.JPG
Views:	402
Size:	217.9 KB
ID:	56801  
Amok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 00:38   #42
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Pai da, dar atunci nu poti arata live "uite, merge ca Intel"
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 00:41   #43
guest13
Ancient friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 1,008
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Din ce zice unul care nu stie cum e cu turbo se pare ca pe toate core-urile e 3,5Ghz la 6900k:

"I've just installed Windows 10 on my new system i7 6900k asrock x99m fatal1ty killer 3.1 (matx) and according to cpu-z the cpu at 100% load is 3.5GHz (x35) instead of 3.7GHz as stated in arc cpu spec. Bios has all auto settings, ram frequency is auto at 2000mhz, i pushed it to 2666mhz to no prevail. "

Deci am putea sa consideram testele cu "big gun" ca 99% match pt 6900k.
guest13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 00:44   #44
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Nu...pentru ca multe placi de baza fac asta iar ei l-au setat mai mult ca sigur manual. Te cred...e greu...dar hai sa lasam speculatiile si sa vedem raspunsul de la AMD si cum merge 6900K de fapt
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 00:46   #45
rodarkone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,153
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)


Default

I7 6700K default
32 GB DDR3 @ 3000 MHz 15-17-17-35
Win 10 pro x64 (neactivat )
100 samples / cuda 0ff
37.33 s

@4500
39.41 ????
*later edit am repetat testul 35.59s

@4800
33.31s
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	blender.jpg
Views:	357
Size:	378.7 KB
ID:	56802  

Last edited by rodarkone; 15-12-2016 at 01:21.
rodarkone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:25   #46
guest13
Ancient friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 1,008
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Xeon E5-2667 v4
SR2P5 (R0)
8 3.2 GHz 3/3/3/3/3/3/4/4 8 × 256 KB 20 MB
135 W
LGA 2011-3

Asta ar fi echivalentul xeon(pt dual socket) pt 6900k :8core/3.2ghz default/20mb cache.
Turbo incepe de la 3. Nu vad de ce la seria enthusiast, sa aiba turbo mai prost ca la seria pt workstation/server.
Dar poate apare si un 6900k sa ne lamurim pe deplin si sa nu mai facem speculatii. Oricum AMD cred ca stii ce tip de raspuns o sa iti dea nu?

uite si ceva interesant:

Avand rezultatul lui rodarkone de mai sus : 6700k default 37.33s si luand datele din testul alora cam cat ar da un 6900k? cam 23.59 cumva?
guest13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:26   #47
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

AMD o sa imi dea un raspuns cat se poate de oficial si corect, te asigur.
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:36   #48
Arise
VIP
 
Arise's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18,987
Mentioned: 790 Post(s)

PC-ul meu



Default

@guest13: Hai să nu mai extrapolăm...
__________________
Using your brain is good for you.
Arise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:36   #49
guest13
Ancient friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 1,008
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Da dar plin de marketing bullshit mai mult ca sigur.
Oricum daca 6900k are intr-adevar pe la 24 sau hai si 27-28 functie de sistem etc etc eu prevad multi dezamagiti pe internet tinand cont ca ryzen are 36 si amd le promitea ca bate 6900k-ul...
guest13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:42   #50
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Inca nu intelegi....le-am trimis un mail oficial celor din UK, care au intrebat oficial mai departe la headquarters in US exact ce setari au schimbat in afara de samples si daca au folosit aceleasi setari pentru ambele procesoare. Crede-ma, nu au cum sa nu raspunda punctual

Eu iti inteleg si nerabdarea si dorinta de a extrapola, problema este ca mie nu imi place sa strig "hotii" pana nu am dovezi sau pana nu inteleg exact cum au testat. De aia nu are rost sa extrapolam acum...
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:50   #51
guest13
Ancient friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 1,008
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arise View Post
@guest13: Hai să nu mai extrapolăm...
Nu e nici o extrapolare. E un fapt: in Blender 6900k are o performanta cu 58% mai buna ca 6700k.Uitate pe poza care am puso. Punct.Singurele abateri care apar aici sunt de sistem,abateri care sunt inerente fiecare avand memorii, placa de baza etc etc diferite.Dar procentele pe acolo sunt.

Singura varianta in care am gresit ar fi ca aia care au facut testul ala sa fi gresit ei dar testul e destul de vechi(cateva luni) si se sesiza careva pana acum . Oricum diferenta da exact cat calculasem eu cand am zis 24s+/- 1,5 .

LE: Pe tine te inteleg Monstrule stai linistit, ai o pozitie oarecum ingrata in cazul asta ca daca te apuci sa arunci cu pietre pe viitor apar probleme. Tu trebuie sa fii ca o balerina pe cand noi astia din popor putem sa ne comportam ca un elefant in magazinul cu portelanuri.
Doar ca deja reviewul de la hardwarecanucks imi confirma calculele din cate se poate vedea.

Last edited by guest13; 15-12-2016 at 01:54.
guest13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 01:54   #52
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Nu ti cont de ce a explicat Amok mai sus... In Blender diferenta de performanta depinde si de cat de complexa este scena si cat dureaza randarea. Si orice test cauti tu pe net va fi default cu 200 samples nu cu 100. Deci efectiv nu poti extrapola
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:05   #53
guest13
Ancient friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 1,008
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Daca tot ziceam de elefanti:
Cu un lucru cred ca esti de acord: AMD au ales o scena care sa avantajeze ryzen.
In conditia asta as extrapola acum si as zice ca exista sansa ca la o scena mai complexa sa iasa mai rau :P
Scena din testul hardwarechanucks are 144s pe cand asta amd are 37s pe 6700k...
guest13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:10   #54
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Din contra, cu cat e scena mai simpla cu atat diferenta este mai mica. Acum nici nu mai extrapolezi cum trebuie?
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:16   #55
guest13
Ancient friend
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bucuresti
Posts: 1,008
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Scena simpla diferenta mica>scena complexa diferenta mare
Tot iese rau ryzen .
Dar e cam tarziu si maine munca asa ca hai sa mai extrapolam maine. Sau la un pahar de palinca dupa workshop
guest13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:20   #56
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Auzi la el...maine munca... da eu ce fac acum bre?
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:21   #57
Boggy
Ancient friend
 
Boggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 15,314
Mentioned: 883 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Default

Din ce vad eu acum, Ryzen-ul de 8/16 si-o ia-n bot de la 6700k @ 4.5, care a obtinut FIX 34.28s cat a obtinut 3930k-ul lui Amok @ 4.4.

Sincer, mie mi se pare cam alandala Blender asta, sunt curios daca in alte aplicatii profi diferentele sunt tot pe-acolo.

Sa repet ca am activat GPU rendering si m-a troznit cu +50% timp? )

In fine, sa asteptam setarile exacte ale celor de la AMD, poate ne scapa ceva.
__________________
Boggy doesn't have a computer.
Just a basement full of Asian kids that memorize numbers.
Boggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:27   #58
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Nu e alandala man, e alandala scena lor. Baga o scena real life de peste cateva minute si lucrurile stau altfel...
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:30   #59
matose
Administrator
 
matose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,803
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)

PC-ul meu

Send a message via Yahoo to matose
Default

Intel Core i7 6950X - 4200MHz (10c/20t)
32GB DDR4 2133 CL15
Windows 10
16s - samples 100

Ha
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	6950x@4200mhz.jpg
Views:	384
Size:	297.6 KB
ID:	56803  
__________________
matose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-12-2016, 02:34   #60
Monstru
Administrator
 
Monstru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 21,135
Mentioned: 770 Post(s)


Send a message via Yahoo to Monstru
Default

Ideea de baza este ca asta e un demo ales de ei pentru show. In 3DSMax, Maya sau Blender randezi deobicei treburi mai complexe si diferenta se vede mult mai usor. In fine... ne-a dat matei capac de tot cu scorul asta ))
__________________
Suma prostiei ramane constanta. Doar prostii se schimba...
Monstru is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jocuri noi cu benchmark integrat sau utilitar de benchmark Monstru Gaming 101 05-07-2020 18:27
AMD Tech Summit 2016 ? Noi detalii despre AMD Radeon Instinct si AMD RyZEN LAB501 Articole 1 14-12-2016 11:23
GPU/CPU render Benchmark Blender Amok Overclocking & benchmarking 84 27-10-2015 16:43
Parerile voastre despre acest GTX980 DjLeco Placi video 21 10-04-2015 12:24
Pov-Ray Benchmark TheDogg Overclocking & benchmarking 11 07-01-2012 21:11

 
Forum Stats
Members: 9,575
Threads: 27,918
Posts: 783,093
Total Online: 3376

Newest Member: Skylinedoom

Latest Threads
- by suzuki
- by Kspic
- by matose

Advertisement

Partner Links



All times are GMT +3. The time now is 13:50.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.